Integrate Kotest instead of the plain unit test framework #4

New Issue

emil · 2025-02-13T15:07:28Z

emil commented

2025-02-13 15:07:28 +00:00

Here is the quick start documentation.

Here is the [quick start documentation](https://kotest.io/docs/quickstart/).

emil added this to the MVP project 2025-02-13 15:07:28 +00:00

emil moved this to In Progress in MVP on 2025-02-13 15:07:34 +00:00

emil commented

2025-02-15 22:08:11 +00:00

Unfortunately, adding kotest turned out to be quite tedious and I couldn't make it work with this multiplatform project.

It's not crucial to have it and we can leave with the off-the-shelf unit test framework.

Specs are nice-to-have.
Assertions could be compensated by integrating assertK.
I was curious to give property testing a try. Maybe it could be tried out at a later stage.

Unfortunately, adding kotest turned out to be quite tedious and I couldn't make it work with this multiplatform project. It's not crucial to have it and we can leave with the off-the-shelf unit test framework. 1. Specs are nice-to-have. 2. Assertions could be compensated by integrating `assertK`. 3. I was curious to give property testing a try. Maybe it could be tried out at a later stage.

emil moved this to Done in MVP on 2025-02-15 22:08:31 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: the-liberated-edge/AstrologyLibrary#4